"But there was nothing about the little, low-rambling, more or less identical homes of Northumberland Estates to interest or to haunt, no chance of loot that would be any more than the ordinary, waking-world kind the cops hauled you in for taking; no small immunities, no possibilities for hidden life or otherworldly presence; no trees, secret routes, shortcuts, culverts, thickets that could be made hollow in the middle – everything in the place was right out in the open, everything could be seen at a glance; and behind it, under it, around the corners of its houses and down the safe, gentle curves of its streets, you came back, you kept coming back, to nothing; nothing but the cheerless earth."
Thomas Pynchon, "The Secret Integration"

This is Ian Mathers' Tumblr. I live in Canada. I've written about music and other things for Stylus, PopMatters, Resident Advisor, the Village Voice, and a few other places. Hi.

imathers@gmail.com

 

'cis' and implicit outing

abigailbrady:

A sex worker friend complains of discussions about sex work where every participant prefaces their anti-abolitionist stance with “I’m not a sex worker but”.  She is left with the options of saying silent, lying, or outing herself.

That’s how felt last Friday, when I saw another friend recommending that everyone who is cis take advantage of Facebook’s new gender options, to say “cis female” or “cis male”, to remove the assumption that “cis” is the default.  This was a fairly clued-up friend, but I don’t think she’d thought the implications of this.

I used to be stealth, kind of.  I was never very good at it (both in the passing department and in the not telling anyone section).  Now, I have it in my fucking twitter bio, and my god it reduces the anxiety about wondering who knows.  I can do that because of other privilege I have - I am white, middle class, with high earning potential, and live in a city where I have a support network.

But just because I’ve been fortunate enough to make a decision doesn’t mean anyone else should be forced to make the same one.  There are lots of people who aren’t out, for various reasons.  That’s entirely up to them, and we need provide a context where they do not have that silence/lying/outing trilemma.

Imagine you’re trans and stealth and loads of your friends on Facebook have changed their gender to “cis male”/”cis female”.  What do you do?  You can’t put it to “trans” without outing yourself, something that may well affect your personal safety, employment status, etc, regardless of whether some set of your Facebook friends are going to be cool with it.  You could change it to say “cis”, I suppose, but you might well think that is a crossing the line into a lie. (Stealth is not lying.  Stealth is keeping quiet and sometimes fudging things.)  So, stay silent?  The thing is, at some point, if “cis” catches on as an identity, an unadorned “female” or “male” will become suspicious.

And then what if you are trans and pre-transition, either because you haven’t quite figured out what you are yet, or because you are not in a position to be able to.  You would have to call yourself “cis” even though you don’t feel it’s quite right, or know it’s not true.

As an abstract concept “cis” is absolutely needed, but as an identity it has problems.  When it’s relevant go ahead and acknowledge it, but don’t go flaunting it just as a default.  And perhaps - sometimes - in solidarity - it would be better to refuse to confirm or deny.

Alternate Punchlines Include: But You’re Right, There’s “No Such Thing As Cis Privilege”

manna-di-san-nicola:

As a trans woman, I can’t:

  1. Be femme (because I’m “over-performing” my gender, to quote Julie Bindel, and reinforcing the patriarchy besides by relying on harmful stereotypes of womanhood)
  2. Be butch or even not femme (because therapists wouldn’t even listen to me if my gender expression wasn’t Princess Peach [you ever think of that as an explanation, Julie Bindel?])
  3. Be assertive (because I’m “exercising my male privilege” and “innate masculinity” [because saying women can’t be confident is good feminism])
  4. Be passive (again, reinforcing the patriarchy)
  5. Be straight (because I’m “actually a deranged gay man desperate to fit into the patriarchy”)
  6. Be gay (because I’m “actually a deranged straight man desperate to get my dick into lesbian-only spaces”)
  7. Have sexual reassignment surgery (because it’s “unnecessary genital mutilation” according to people for whom it is completely unnecessary and “won’t make [me] a woman any more than shoving a vacuum down one’s pants makes them a man” [how right you are, BEING A WOMAN MAKES ME A WOMAN])
  8. Not have sexual reassignment surgery (because I’d be faking it if I wanted to keep my penis and having a penis makes me a horrifying nuclear reactor of masculine rape energy that will trigger everyone around me even if I wear two layers of tights over underwear and under pants and never remove any of them)
  9. Ever use a bathroom ever, you disgusting deviant, just your existence is harassment
  10. Get any support from the Salvation Army, who would literally just let me die on their steps
  11. Automatically assume that someone who identifies as feminist or even queer is a friend to me
  12. Ever know with certainty that I wasn’t fired or just didn’t get a job at all because someone along the line realized I’m trans
  13. Travel without being detained for years because my passport says M and I’m F
  14. Date anyone without being afraid that telling them will repulse them to the point of murdering me and then literally submitting to a jury of their peers that my being transgender was so horrifying that it drove them temporarily insane 

But, you know, being called ‘cis’ on the Internet sounds rough too.

thebeatleswereterrible:

"It’s the social economic version of “just stop being depressed”"

holy shit

thats it

thats exactly what bothers me about “forget money follow your dreams” like lol ok poor people just stop being poor and do things start a business 

just acknowledge we live in a capitalist society and that following a dream isn’t achievable for everyone like. be real. i’m a positive person but i’m not full of illusions about how things work.

When J.K. Rowling delivered her Commencement Address to Harvard graduates she very concisely described how I have been feeling for about a decade when she said “Poverty entails fear, and stress, and sometimes depression; it means a thousand petty humiliations and hardships.”

I also very much related to her when she wrote, in a lengthy and carefully-researched Times editorial on being a single parent, “Nobody who has ever experienced the reality of poverty could say ‘it’s not the money, it’s the message’. When your flat has been broken into, and you cannot afford a locksmith, it is the money. When you are two pence short of a tin of baked beans, and your child is hungry, it is the money. When you find yourself contemplating shoplifting to get nappies, it is the money.” It reminded me of those times when, as that student both working and studying and clawing at the very bottom of my bank account or as that Tottenham resident writing and calling everyone to find a job or financial support, I was always a few pence short of one thing or another. Petty, tiny amounts of money decided what I could or could not do, or eat, and similarly petty were the choices I made to save that money. Another long walk home in the driving rain to save a bus fare. No lunch so that I can pay back a library fine.

On Poverty

Ha, what an appropriate day to run into this post. I’m not in the UK and it sounds like things are a little more horrific there in general, but I identified painfully with a lot of this. Emphasis here mine.

Occupy was right: capitalism has failed the world

Normally I like to do these things as quotations instead, but this interview with Thomas Piketty is both so interesting and so irreducible to a shorter point that I’m just going to use a link. Basically, Piketty set out to actually get the data on inequality and the effects of capitalism, and some pretty entrenched economists are saying his book about that data is going to mark a pretty major turning point in how we think about this kind of thing. Okay, one quick quotation:

And what I found, as I said before, is that the speed at which the inequality gap is growing is getting faster and faster. You have to ask what does this mean for ordinary people, who are not billionaires and who will never will be billionaires. Well, I think it means a deterioration in the first instance of the economic wellbeing of the collective, in other words the degradation of the public sector. You only have to look at what Obama’s administration wants to do – which is to erode inequality in healthcare and so on – and how difficult it is to achieve that, to understand how important this is. There is a fundamentalist belief by capitalists that capital will save the world, and it just isn’t so. Not because of what Marx said about the contradictions of capitalism, because, as I discovered, capital is an end in itself and no more.

As he says elsewhere in the interview, we may well have guessed that “capital is an end in itself and no more” in the past, but he didn’t start from that conclusion; he started by amassing the data and that’s where he wound up. I’m going to have to read that book.